Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Minimum Widths at Which Horizontal Scrolling Can Be Avoided Show that New Wide Monitors Provide Advantages
 
Version 1 5:11 AM 11/18/2009
For a long time I had been toughing it out using a NEC MultiSync 75 monitor, with a screen area of 121 square inches, and a width of 12.75 inches. This week I acquired a new Samsung 2343BWX monitor with a screen area of 225 square inches, and a width of 20 inches.
 
I decided the wise thing to do would be to assess the advantages produced by the new monitor, because such assessment would render me more capable of taking advantage of the capabilities of the new monitor, and help me to understand if the investment in the new monitor is worth it. After all, it is possible that the newest versions of things are merely a fad and not worth the money. Also such assessment is useful to and impresses persons. I concluded that I had 'hoofed it' and 'toughed it out' for way too long with the old NEC MultiSync 75.
 
As of now I conclude that the new wide Samsung 2343 BWX monitor offers significant advantage because a page on the monitor, at the minimum width at which no horizontal scrolling is required and the horizontal scroll bar disappears from view, takes up a much lower percentage of the total monitor screen width compared to my old NEC MultiSync 75.
 
For example, the MSN main page, at the minimum width at which the horizontal scroll bar disappears, takes up 76% of the monitor width on the NEC MultiSync 75, leaving only 3 inches of width for other windows such as notepad. But with the Samsung 2343BWX, the MSN main page at the minimum width at which the horizontal scroll bar disappears, takes up only 50% of the monitor width leaving 10 inches of monitor width for other windows.
 
True, you can find pages that will require horizontal scrolling when at maximum width on both the NEC MultiSync 75 and also the Samsung 2343 BWX; however, most of the web pages are not like that.
 
Obviously, it is a huge pain in the ass to have to tinker around with horizontal scrolling when reading a web page. Also, it is another huge pain in the ass, to have to switch back and forth between having one window in front and another window in front; such leads to a need to temporarily memorize things and makes it impossible to type into one window while reading from another window. When a window containing say notepad is compressed to a tiny width due to necessities generated by a small monitor screen width, less of the text in the notepad document is visible at a glance. Such problems are exacerbated when more than two windows are open. Attempting to place one window above another window run into problems because of all the space at the top of the windows that is used for things like Google search toolbar, buttons, menu, address, tabs list.
 
With the 20 inch width on the Samsung,  I find that more of the links in quick launch and etc are visible at a glance.
 
We hear alot about the computer's effect on computing speed; however, everything seems to function at a faster speed with the new Samsung monitor.
 
Using the 20 inch wide screen on the Samsung 2343BWX, for me feels like being out in the great outdoors, compared to the relatively claustrophobic feeling of having to deal with a monitor with a width of only 12.75 inches.
 
The web pages on the Samsung 2343 bwx look brighter, the colors in the web pages look cleaner compared to the NEC MultiSync 75; I find that this uplifits my spirit.
 
Using the Samsung 2343BWX improves my morale. Using the Samsung 2343BWX I feel young, accomplished, energetic, optimistic and clean. Using the little old monitor, I now realize, had a demoralizing effect on me.  
 
But this should not be taken as an insult to NEC. The NEC monitor was built at a time when the level of engineering sophistication was lower; the NEC monitor is cheaper; the NEC monitor is old whereas the Samsung is brand new.
 
Table 1 below shows information I gathered regarding the amount of width web pages eat up on a monitor when pages are at the minimum width at which the horizontal scroll bar disappears because it is no longer necessary.

Table 1
Widths of Web Pages if no Horizontal Scrolling Required
(text sizes used are smallest I feel comfortable with; resolutions shown are minimum and maximum except for NEC 1280x768, because the Quick Launch Bar disappeared on the NEC MultiSync 75 at its max resolution of 1280x1029; I found that text size in Internet Explorer did not effect the minimum width at which horizontal scrolling can be avoided)
 


NEC MultiSync 75
Dimensions: H: 9.5";
W: 12.75"

Samsung 2343BWX
Dimensions: H: 11.25";
W: 20"


Page
NEC
MultiSync 75
800x600 Res
Medium
text size
NEC
MultiSync 75
1280x768 Res
'Medium'
text size

 
Samsung
2343BWX
800x600 Res
'Smaller'
text size
Samsung
2343BWX
2048x1152 Res
'Medium'
text size



Minimum width of page in inches
if no horizontal scrolling required


msn
main page
Page would require
20% more width
than max available
if no horizontal
scrolling required.
9.75"

Page would require
20% more width
than max available
if no horizontal
scrolling required.
10"


Google search
sample search
12"
7"

18"
7"


Google News
Main page
12.75"
7.5"

20"
7.75"


MSNBC
Sample page
Page would require
20% more width
than max available
if no horizontal
scrolling required.
9.75"

Page would require
20% more width
than max available
if no horizontal
scrolling required.
10"


Newsweek
Sample page
Page would require
20% more width
than max available
if no horizontal
scrolling required
9.75"

Page would require
20% more width
than max available
if no horizontal
scrolling required.
10"


Folder with three columns at default widths 6"
3.5"

9"
3.5"









 
@2009 David Virgil Hobbs